WPInsightful Audit Suite

Accessibility Checker

Find common automated accessibility issues and manual-review priorities.

Private report

Enter any public HTTP or HTTPS website. Private network addresses are blocked.

Test experience
Report preview

Your audit results will appear here

Start the test above to generate scores, measurements, recommendations, and a downloadable report.

Ready to test
—Grade
—Overall score
—Critical
—Warnings
—Passed
—Accessible Names
—Color Contrast
—Page Structure
—ARIA & Forms

Website Accessibility Checker Guide

How our website accessibility checker helps

A website accessibility checker can quickly identify common barriers that make a page harder to use with assistive technology. The private report explains what was detected, why it matters and how to verify each correction.

What the accessibility scan checks

The automated scan reviews detectable issues involving color contrast, accessible names, form labels, headings, landmarks, document structure and ARIA usage. Findings include context and a recommended next action.

Automated testing and WCAG

Automation is a valuable first step, but it cannot certify complete WCAG conformance. Keyboard navigation, screen-reader behavior, zoom, content clarity and real-user journeys also need manual testing.

How to prioritize accessibility fixes

Resolve critical barriers first, then address high and medium findings. Confirm that fixes work with a keyboard and at least one screen reader before rerunning the website accessibility checker.

Frequently asked questions

Does a passing scan guarantee compliance?

No. A passing automated scan does not guarantee legal compliance or full WCAG conformance because many requirements need human judgment.

Can I test more than one page?

Yes. Run a separate audit for every important public page because templates, content and resources can produce different findings.

Explore related website checks

Use the SEO checker, website speed checker and website accessibility checker together for a broader view of page quality.

Get more value from the accessibility checker

Use the guidance below to prepare the page, interpret the results and build a repeatable improvement process.

Preparing a page for accessibility review

Test the complete public page, including forms, menus, dialogs and content that appears after interaction. Automated tools can only inspect elements available in the rendered page. If important features require an account, create a separate manual testing plan for those journeys. The website accessibility checker is most useful when it becomes part of design, content and release quality assurance instead of a one-time task.

Combine automation with keyboard testing

After reviewing automated findings, navigate from the address bar through the whole page using Tab, Shift plus Tab, Enter, Space and arrow keys. Every interactive control should receive a visible focus indicator and work without a mouse. Confirm that focus order follows the visual reading order and does not become trapped inside menus or dialogs. These checks reveal barriers that an accessibility checker may not fully understand.

Add screen-reader and zoom review

Listen to the page with a commonly used screen reader and verify that headings, landmarks, controls, errors and status updates have meaningful names. Increase browser zoom to 200 and 400 percent and check that text remains readable without losing functions. Review instructions for clarity and avoid relying only on color, position or sensory descriptions. Record manual findings alongside the automated report.

Maintain accessibility over time

New content, design components and third-party widgets can introduce regressions even after previous issues were fixed. Create accessible component patterns, train editors to use headings and alternative text correctly, and include representative users in important testing. Rerun the accessibility checker after meaningful releases, but remember that a high automated score is evidence of testing rather than a guarantee of complete WCAG conformance.

Make accessibility a shared responsibility

Designers should define contrast, focus and interaction states; developers should preserve semantic HTML and keyboard behavior; editors should write meaningful links, headings and alternative text. Include accessibility acceptance criteria in every feature and provide a clear way for visitors to report barriers. Keep a record of automated and manual tests, affected components, fixes and verification steps. Using the accessibility checker within this shared process helps prevent repeated defects and supports a more inclusive experience as the website grows.